Main Article Content
CoViD-19, Jordan, pharmacy training, pharmacy students, virtual training
Background: This study aims to assess the perception of pharmacy students towards this new modality of training during CoViD-19 period. Methods: Senior pharmacy students were included in this study. Accredited and certified community pharmacy preceptors were asked to simulate the community pharmacy training and record that as videos, which were evaluated and assessed by expert academics before being delivered to students. A validated online questionnaire was then distributed for self-administration electronically to evaluate their perception. Results: A convenience sample (n=109) of senior pharmacy students were recruited. The majority of the participants were females (70.6%) and the median age of students was 22.0 years (IQR= 1). Around half of the participants showed positive perceptions towards the virtual training module and the pharmacy training preceptors. A 46.8% of the students benefited from the virtual training in time management, and 43.1% in developing lifelong learning skills. The absence of eye contact during the learning was the most important barrier revealed by the students (52.3%). Half of the students agreed/strongly agreed that combining the virtual and conventional techniques for future training would improve training outcomes. Conclusion: While students had an overall positive experience, there were many hurdles that need to be addressed, such as lack of communication and technical support. This spot the light on the crucial need to continually improve and redesign our experiential education; to achieve optimum learning outcomes for students.
pages, U.S. $49.00. The Internet and Higher Education. 2008;11(3-4):220-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.09.001
2. Rothman T, Romeo L, Brennan M, et al. Criteria for Assessing Student Satisfaction with Online Courses. International Journal for e-Learning Security. 2011;1. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijels.2046.4568.2011.0004
3. Al-Mohaithef M, Padhi BK. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Saudi Arabia: a web-based national survey. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2020;13:1657. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S276771
4. Young S. Student Views of Effective Online Teaching in Higher Education. Copyright. 2006;20(2):65-77. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15389286ajde2002_2
5. Bangert A. The Seven Principles of Good Practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching. The Internet and Higher Education. 2004;7(3):217-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.003
6. Maddux C, Sprague D, Ferdig R, et al. Editorial: Online education: Issues and research questions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 2007;15:157-166.
7. Boehme AK EC, Elkind MS. Stroke Risk Factors, Genetics, and Prevention. 2017;120(3):472-495. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCRESAHA.116.308398
8. Etter J-F. A self-administered questionnaire to measure cigarette withdrawal symptoms: The Cigarette Withdrawal Scale.Nicotine Tob Res. 2005;7(1):47-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200412331328501
9. RaoSoft. Sample size calculator.
10. De Ponti R, Marazzato J, Maresca AM, et al. Pre-graduation medical training including virtual reality during COVID-19 pandemic: a report on students’ perception. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20(1):332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02245-8
11. Parahoo S, Santally M, Rajabalee Y, et al. Designing a predictive model of student satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Marketing for HIGHER EDUCATION. 2015;1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2015.1083511
12. Ziaee V, Ahmadinejad Z, Morravedji AR. An Evaluation on Medical Students’ Satisfaction with Clinical Education and its Effective Factors. Medical Education Online. 2004;9(1):4365. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v9i.4365
13. Abu Farha R, Elayeh E, Zalloum N, et al. Perception of pharmacy students towards their community pharmacy training experience: a cross-sectional study from Jordan. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1):161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-
14. Chhetri B, Goyal LM, Mittal M, et al. Estimating the prevalence of stress among Indian students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study from India. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2021;16(2):260-267. https://doi.org/https://
15. Al-Tammemi AaB, Akour A, Alfalah L. Is It Just About Physical Health? An Online Cross-Sectional Study Exploring the Psychological Distress Among University Students in Jordan in the Midst of COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychol. 2020;11:562213. https://doi.
16. Barakat M, Farha RA, Muflih S, et al. The era of E-learning from the perspectives of Jordanian medical students: A crosssectional study. Heliyon. 2022;8(7):e09928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09928
17. Bouw JW, Gupta V, Hincapie AL. Assessment of students’ satisfaction with a student-led team-based learning course. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2015;12:23. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.23
18. Serwah A. Assessment of the level of satisfaction of final year’s medical students with the clinical training at taif teaching hospitals, KSA. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education. 2015;3(2):64-71. https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20150611063851
19. Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ. 2004;328(7451):1312-1315. https:// doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312
20. Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education. 2018;48(6):1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
21. Al-Wazaify M, Matowe L, Albsoul-Younes A, et al. Pharmacy education in jordan, saudi arabia, and kuwait. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2006;70(1):18. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700118
22. AbuBlan RS, Nazer LH, Jaddoua SM, et al. A Hospital-based Pharmacy Internship Program in Jordan. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2019;83(3):6547. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6547
23. Douglass MA, Casale JP, Skirvin JA, et al. A virtual patient software program to improve pharmacy student learning in a comprehensive disease management course. American Journal of pharmaceutical Education. 2013;77(8):172. https://doi.
24. Marriott JL. Use and evaluation of “virtual” patients for assessment of clinical pharmacy undergraduates. Pharmacy Education. 2007;7(4):341-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15602210701673795
25. Hussainy SY, Styles K, Duncan G. A virtual practice environment to develop communication skills in pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2012;76(10):202. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7610202
26. De Ponti R, Marazzato J, Maresca AM, et al. Pre-graduation medical training including virtual reality during COVID-19 pandemic: a report on students’ perception. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02245-8
27. Darr AY, Erickson S, Devine T, et al. Design and students’ perceptions of a virtually facilitated outpatient pharmacy practice laboratory course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2019;11(7):729-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
28. Lucas C, Williams K, Bajorek B. Virtual pharmacy programs to prepare pharmacy students for community and hospital placements. American journal of pharmaceutical education. 2019;83(10):7011. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7011
29. Ambroziak K, Ibrahim N, Marshall VD, et al. Virtual simulation to personalize student learning in a required pharmacy course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2018;10(6):750-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.017
30. Basheti IA. The effect of using simulation for training pharmacy students on correct device technique. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2014;78(10):177. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7810177
31. Gallagher S. Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000;4(1):14-
32. Vlek R, van Acken J-P, Beursken E, et al. BCI and a User’s Judgment of Agency. Brain-Computer-Interfaces in their ethical, social and cultural contexts: Springer; 2014;193-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8996-7_16
33. Ulloa JL, Vastano R, George N, et al. The impact of eye contact on the sense of agency. Consciousness and Cognition. 2019;74:102794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102794