Fostering empathy and social responsibility in pharmacy students through experiential service-learning: A qualitative study
Main Article Content
Keywords
Positive psychology, Pharmacy education, Experiential learning, Transformative learning, Empathy
Abstract
Background: Pharmacy education is increasingly incorporating experiential learning approaches to develop holistic healthcare professionals. Key competencies like empathy, social responsibility, and interpersonal skills are essential for patient-centered care. Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory and Mezirow’s Transformative Learning Theory provide theoretical frameworks for understanding how real-world experiences can foster these essential skills. This study examines how service-learning experiences, such as volunteering, influence first-year pharmacy students' emotional growth, empathy, and reflective thinking. Objective: To explore the impact of service-learning through volunteering on pharmacy students’ development of empathy, personal reflection, and social responsibility, Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory and Mezirow’s Transformative Learning Theory are used as analytical frameworks. Methods: This exploratory qualitative study was conducted at Dubai Pharmacy College for Girls (DPCG) in the United Arab Emirates. A purposive sample of first-year Bachelor of Pharmacy students was recruited, and small group discussions were conducted on Microsoft Teams using an interview guide after students' participation in volunteering experiences at nursing homes for elderly individuals and shelters for children. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, guided by Braun & Clarke’s framework. Kolb’s learning cycle and Mezirow’s transformative learning model were used to interpret the data and map the themes to students' emotional and reflective development. Results: Six key themes emerged from the data: The analysis revealed six key themes from the students’ reflections on their service-learning experiences. Emotional growth and personal reflection highlighted how students developed empathy and gratitude for their own lives through interactions with vulnerable populations. They also formed meaningful connections and engagement, building deep relationships with the elderly and children while learning valuable life lessons. Despite challenges and barriers, especially due to COVID-19 restrictions, students adapted to create meaningful connections. Kindness in action was evident as students engaged in acts of kindness, such as gift-giving and providing emotional support. Through learning and reflection, students recognized the impact of small gestures and honed essential social and emotional skills. Finally, students suggested improvement, advocating for extended interaction time and continuity in service-learning projects for a more sustained impact. Conclusion: Service-learning activities foster significant emotional growth, empathy, and perspective transformation among pharmacy students. The study demonstrates how hands-on experiences combined with reflection can nurture empathy and social responsibility, contributing to the holistic development of future healthcare professionals.
References
2. International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP). The FIP Development Goals. Transforming global pharmacy [Internet]. Available from: https://www.fip.org/file. Accessed 2022 Nov 27.
3. Health Foundation (Great Britain). Person-centered care made simple: what everyone should know about person-centred care [Internet]. Health Foundation; 2016. Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/PersonCentredCareMadeSimple_0.pdf. Accessed 2022 Nov 27.
4. Kim SS, Kaplowitz S, Johnston MV. The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Eval Health Prof. 2004;27(3):237-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278704267037.
5. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1984.
6. Mezirow J. Transformative learning: theory to practice. New Dir Adult Contin Educ. 1997;(74):5-12. doi:10.1002/ACE.7401.
7. Hollingsworth JC, Teeter BS, Westrick SC. Evaluation of student outcomes after participating in a Medicare outreach program. J High Educ Outreach Engagem. 2015;19(2):139-54. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067015.pdf.
8. Black L, Cochran T, Furze J, Qi Y. Student perceptions of social responsibility and community-engaged learning: validation of a survey for health professionals [Internet]. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Student-Perceptions-of-Social-Responsibility-and-of-Black-Cochran/270b617cf81e06b6cf5d78e2e03d92eb91de7f6c.
9. Adkins DM, Mayhew SL, Gavaza P, Rahman S. Pharmacy students’ attitudes toward geriatric nursing home patients. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(5):81. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe76581.
10. Blebil AQ, Dujaili JA, Mohammed AH, Thiruchelvam K, Lee S, Elkalmi R, Soh YC, Yong A, Roien R. Knowledge and attitude of pharmacy students regarding geriatric care: questionnaire-based analysis in Malaysia. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022;95-102. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S344872.
11. Abd Wahab MS, Othman N, Kowalski SR, Zulkifly HH, Ali AA, Ming LC, Majeed AB. Pharmacy students’ and pharmacists’ perceptions about geriatric pharmacotherapy education. Pharm Educ. 2017;17. Available from: https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/468.
12. Mays M. Pharmacy for the future: a student’s perspective on pediatric pharmacy [Internet]. Butler University; 2018. Available from: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1038&context=buwell.
13. Mantzourani E, Deslandes R, Ellis L, Williams G. Exposing pharmacy students to challenges surrounding care of young children via a novel role-emerging placement. J Curric Teach. 2016;5(1):124-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jct.v5n1p124.
14. Eyler J, Giles DE. Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1999.
15. Magnani E, Zhu R. Does kindness lead to happiness? Voluntary activities and subjective well-being. J Behav Exp Econ. 2018;77:20-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2018.09.009.
16. Llenares II, Sario JA, Bialba D, Dela Cruz J. Volunteerism influences on student resilience and gratitude. J Psychol Afr. 2020;30:211-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2020.1777031.
17. Meyer M, Neumayr M, Rameder P. Students’ community service: self-selection and the effects of participation. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2019;48(6):1162-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019848492.
18. Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Noyes J, Harris J, Tong A. COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies). In: Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Simera I, Wager E, editors. Guidelines for reporting health research: a user’s manual. Wiley; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118715598.ch21.
19. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
