Optimizing Antenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on How Scheduling Influences Fetal Outcomes
Main Article Content
Keywords
Pregnancy planning, Antenatal care, Fetal health outcomes, Neonatal well-being
Abstract
Introduction: Maternal and neonatal health outcomes are significantly influenced by the presence or absence of prenatal care. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate the impact of booked and unbooked pregnancies on fetal outcomes, addressing existing gaps in the literature. Despite extensive research on this topic, no prior meta-analysis has systematically examined this association. By synthesizing data from 23 studies encompassing 34,908 patients, this study provides novel insights into the relationship between prenatal booking status and fetal health outcomes. Methods: The metaanalysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant literature comparing outcomes between booked and unbooked pregnancies. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary and multigravida pregnancies, singleton and multiple gestations, and both vaginal and Cesarean deliveries. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using established tools. Statistical analyses, including forest plot approaches and sensitivity analyses, were conducted to assess overall effect sizes and address heterogeneity. Results: A total of 23 studies were included, with a combined sample size of 34,908 patients. Significant associations were observed between booked pregnancies and reduced risks of mortality, intrauterine fetal death, stillbirth, early neonatal death, and asphyxia. Booked pregnancies also exhibited a lower incidence of neonatal sepsis. However, heterogeneity and potential publication bias were noted, highlighting the need for cautious interpretation of results. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting the positive impact of prenatal booking on maternal and fetal health outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of timely prenatal care in reducing adverse perinatal outcomes and improving neonatal well-being. Further research is warranted to address heterogeneity and potential biases, informing clinical practice and policy interventions aimed at optimizing maternal and fetal health globally.
References
1. Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Saleem S. Improving pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2018 Jun 22 [cited 2024 Apr 28];15(1):7–14. Available from: https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-018-0524-5
2. Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D, et al. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2010 Oct 6 [cited 2024 Apr 28];(10):CD000934. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164448/
3. da Rosa CQ, da Silveira DS, da Costa JSD. Factors associated with lack of prenatal care in a large municipality. Rev Saude Publica [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2024 Apr 28];48(6):977–84. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285828/
4. Socio-demographic characteristics of the “unbooked mother” [Internet]. PubMed. [cited 2024 Mar 19]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10593156/
5. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ [Internet]. 2021 Mar 29 [cited 2024 Apr 23];372:n71. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71
6. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 23]. Available from: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
7. Okojie OH, Ogboghodo EO, Omoijuanfo EA. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of booked and unbooked pregnancies in Benin City, Southern Nigeria: a comparative study. J Community Med Prim Health Care [Internet]. 2022 Aug 9 [cited 2024 Apr 23];34(2):109–27. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jcmphc/article/view/229493
8. Chigbu B, Onwere S, Kamanu C, Aluka C, Okoro O, Adibe E. Pregnancy outcome in booked and unbooked mothers in Southeastern Nigeria. East Afr Med J. 2010 May;86(6):267–71.
9. Sule-Odu AO, Akiseku AK, Jaiyesimi EO, Adejumo AO, Odelola IO. Ante-natal care utilization and comparison of obstetric performance of pregnant women attending tertiary and secondary/primary health facilities in Southwest Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2020 Sep;37(4):335–41.
10. Bangera RT, Bhavani K, Padmavathi T. Comparative study of outcome of high-risk pregnancies in unbooked and booked cases in tertiary care centre. Int Arch Integr Med. 2020;7(1):1–8.
11. Oguejiofor CB, Okafor LU, Eleje GU, Okafor CG, Ezeigwe CO, Ekwuazi KE, et al. Outcomes in unbooked pregnancies managed in a tertiary hospital in Nnewi. J Gynecol Obstet Mother Health. 2023;1(1):1–8.
12. Owolabi AT, Fatusi AO, Kuti O, Adeyemi A, Faturoti SO, Obiajuwa PO. Maternal complications and perinatal outcomes in booked and unbooked Nigerian mothers. Singapore Med J. 2008 Jul;49(7):526–31.
13. Chourasia S, Yadav K. Analytical study to assess fetal and perinatal outcome in booked and unbooked obstetric cases. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;6(1):203–7.
14. Abisowo OY, Ireti AO, Olusegun FA, Adeniyi OI, Oyedokun OY. Caesarian section for placenta praevia: does booking status affect maternofetal outcome? Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;6(5):306–12.
15. Okonta P, Igberase G. A comparison of booked and unbooked patients with ruptured uterus in a referral hospital in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2007 Apr-Jun;16(2):158–61.
16. Setia S, Maheshwari B. To study maternal complications in booked and unbooked cases. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;4(4):89–93.
17. Pettit KE, Stephenson ML, Truong YN, Henry D, Murphy A, Kim L, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes among scheduled versus unscheduled deliveries in women with prenatally diagnosed, pathologically proven placenta accreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Mar;32(6):927–31.
18. Ekpenyong M. Socio-medical analysis of morbidity pattern and pregnancy outcome of mothers at Adeojo Maternity Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, South-West Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2011 Apr;15(1):123–31.
19. Tucker A, Ogutu D, Yoong W, Nauta M, Fakokunde A. The unbooked mother: a cohort study of maternal and foetal outcomes in a North London Hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Apr;281(4):613–6.
20. Rathod D, Patel H, Kadikar S, Patel R, Mewada B. Study of fetomaternal outcome in indoor booked and emergency patients. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2021;12(1):1–6.
21. Adenaya O, Ibrahim A, Ojo O, Grillo E, Ade-onojobi A, Odelola O. Comparative study of the obstetric outcome between booked and unbooked mothers at the Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta: a two-year review. West J Med Biomed Sci. 2022 Feb;3(1):59–67.
22. Kalim D. Frequency of maternal and perinatal complications among booked and un-booked antenatal women. Khyber Med Univ J. 2015;7(1):1–6.
23. Onyema MC, Obi VO, Nwafor JI, Oliobi CW, Uche-Nwidagu BN, Nweke AN, et al. Profiling the socio-demographic characteristics and outcome of preterm delivery in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;9(8):1168–77.
24. Ogumu EI, Anikwe CC, Okorochukwu BC, Umeononihu OS, Nwokoye BI, Chigozie OF, et al. Fetal and maternal outcome of higher-order multiple pregnancies in a tertiary hospital: a 5-year single-center observational study from Nigeria. SAGE Open Med. 2022 Jan;10:205031212211271.
25. Zaki N, Memon R, Parveen U, Lakhan H. Journal of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Pakistan. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2019;9(3):192–6.
26. George IO, Jeremiah I. Perinatal outcome of babies delivered to eclamptic mothers: a prospective study from a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Int J Biomed Sci. 2009 Dec;5(4):390–4.
27. Iklaki CU, Inaku JU, Ekabua JE, Ekanem EI, Udo AE. Perinatal outcome in unbooked teenage pregnancies in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;2012:1–5.
28. Fasubaa O, Orji E, Ogunlola O, Kuti O, Shittu A. Outcome of singleton breech delivery in Wesley Guild Hospital, Ilesa, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Apr;20(1):1–4.
29. Bulsara NM, Bhatia SG. Study of feto-maternal outcome of pregnancy in booked versus unbooked patients. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2019;7(2):190–5.
30. Ghafoor M, Qureshi I, Soomro S, Shah F, Mughis A, Maqsood Z. Feto-maternal outcomes of labouring patients in booked and unbooked patients. Pak J Health Sci. 2022 Nov;3(6):83–7.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.