An assessment of community pharmacists’ attitudes towards professional practice in the Republic of Moldova

Main Article Content

Maria Cordina
Vladimir Safta
Ala Ciobanu
Nina Sautenkova


Community Pharmacy Services, Professional Practice, Moldova


Pharmacy in Moldova is undergoing a period of transition. The professional practice is adjusting to a market-oriented economy from the previous Soviet system.  The pharmaceutical sector has been liberalised giving rise to a significant increase in the number of community pharmacies. This has led to some adverse effects on the profession of pharmacy with pharmacists having considerable difficulties fulfilling their professional aspirations and possibly losing confidence in further developing their professional role.

Objective:  To assess community pharmacists’ attitudes towards their professional practice and to determine their perceived competence in various pharmaceutical activities.

Methods: A questionnaire which addressed managerial activities, dispensing activities, pharmaceutical care activities, inter-professional relationships, public health and competence was mailed to 600 community pharmacists who were asked to score the importance and perceived competence for each activity on a scale ranging from 0-5. In the case of pharmaceutical care activities, pharmacists were asked to score their degree of agreement or disagreement as to whether it is the responsibility of the pharmacist to engage in specific pharmaceutical care activities.

Results: A total of 370 valid questionnaires were returned giving a response rate of 61.7%. Managerial and dispensing activities were scored the highest both in terms of perceived importance and competence. The more innovative pharmaceutical care activities scored relatively low. Overall scores relating to the importance of pharmacists engaging in public health activities appear to be the lowest of the entire questionnaire. Younger pharmacists between the ages of 22-30 obtained significantly higher scores with regards to the perceived pharmacist’s responsibility in engaging in various pharmaceutical care activities. Respondents who practiced in an accredited pharmacy scored higher in the majority of questions.

Conclusion: Pharmacists in Moldova appear to be deeply rooted in the traditional approach to the practice of pharmacy pertaining mainly to distributive practice model and are somewhat distant from the other models of practice such as pharmaceutical care, drug information and self-care.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 1194 | PDF Downloads 874


1. CIA World Fact Book Moldova. (Accessed 30th August 2007).

2. MacLehose L in McKee M (ed) Health Care Systems in Transition: Republic of Moldova; Copenhagen, European Observatory on Health Care Systems 2000; 4 (5)

3. United States Pharmacopoeia. (Accessed 30th August 2007).

4. Essential drugs in brief. Department of Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy. Health Technology and Pharmaceuticals Cluster, World Health Organization, Geneva 2002; issue 6.

5. Good pharmacy practice in community and hospital settings: annex 7 to the thirty-fifth report of the WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations. WHO technical report series no.885 Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 1999:93-101.

6. Menabde N, Stobbelar F. The patient in focus: A strategy for pharmaceutical sector reform in Newly Independent States. World Health Organisation. Copenhagen 1998. pp13-29.

7. Tiron S, Arion V, Paiu M, Scalnii V, Satan V. Higher Education in the Republic of Moldova. Monographs on Higher Education. UNSCO-CEPES. Bucharest, 2003.

8. Odedina FT, Segal R. Behavioural pharmaceutical care scale for measuring pharmacists activities. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1996; 3:855-65.

9. Holland RW, Nimmo CM. Transitions in pharmacy practice, part1: beyond pharmaceutical care. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999;56:1758-64.

10. Cordina M, McElnay JC, Hughes CM. The importance that community pharmacists in Malta place on the introduction of pharmaceutical care. Pharm World Sci. 1999; 21:69-73.

11. Hughes CM, McCann S. Perceived inter-professional barriers between community pharmacists and general practitioners: a qualitative assessment. Br J Gen Pract. 2003; 53;600-6.

12. Cordina M, Nurmanbetova Nusupzhanovna F, Kulmagambetov Raikhanovich I, Sautenkova N. Pharmacy and Pharmacists’ Perceptions of Pharmaceutical Care in Kazakhstan. Int J Pharm Pract. 2008;16:41-6.

13. Hourihan F, Krass I, Chen T. Rural Community Pharmacy: A Feasible site for health promotion and screening service for cardiovascular risk factors. Aust J Rural Health. 2003;11;28.

14. Developing pharmacy practice: A focus on patient care. Handbook. World Health Organization in collaboration with International Pharmaceutical Federation. 2006. WHO/PSM/PAR/2006.5.

15. Nimmo CM, Holland RW. Transitions in pharmacy practice, part 4: Can a leopard change its spots. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999;56:2458-62.

Most read articles by the same author(s)