Assessment of Texan pharmacists' attitudes, behaviors, and preferences related to continuing pharmacy education
Background: Whether the available Continuing Education (CE) programs meet pharmacists’ continuously increasing needs and preferences is open to question.
Objectives: to investigate pharmacists’ perceptions and attitudes concerning available CE programs, evaluate the pharmacists’ choices with regard to selecting among different CE programs, and investigate the factors that are associated with preference to utilize online CE programs.
Method: A 17-question survey was developed and mailed to a random sample of 600 Texan pharmacists. In addition to collecting basic demographic information, the survey investigated pharmacists’ choices with regard to delivery and content of CE programs, motivations to participation in CE programs, and pharmacists’ preferences for future CE programs.
Results: A total of 161 pharmacists completed the survey and mailed back their responses. Excluding the 75 undeliverable surveys, the response rate was 31%. Approximately 83% of respondents found that currently available CE programs met their educational needs. The most important factors influencing pharmacists’ choices with regard to CE programs were the scope programs, the location where programs are held, and the cost associated with enrolling in such programs. Online CE was the most preferred mode of CE among participants. The factors that were associated with pharmacists’ preferences to complete 50% or more of required CE through online programs were previous use of online CE programs, preference to limit the duration of CE programs to 1 or 2 hour-long, and perceived ability to find adequate CE programs among currently available CE programs.
Conclusion: The findings suggest modalities for CE programs providers on how to improve CE programs in the future in order to meet the preferences of local pharmacists.
2. Texas State Board of Pharmacy. Continuing Education. https://www.pharmacy.texas.gov/infocist/continue.asp (accessed on July 4, 2015).
3. Texas Administrative Code. Examining Board. Texas State Board of Pharmacy. RULE §295 Continuing Education Requirements. at: http://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=22&pt=15&ch=295&rl=8 (accessed on October 28, 2015).
4. Lung Cancer Screening, Summary of Recommendation and Evidence. United States Preventative Services Task Force. December 2013.
5. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, Lackland DT, LeFevre ML, MacKenzie TD, Ogedegbe O9, Smith SC Jr, Svetkey LP, Taler SJ, Townsend RR, Wright JT Jr, Narva AS, Ortiz E. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311(5):507-520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427
6. Schindel TJ, Kehrer JP, Yuksel N, Hughes CA. University-based continuing education for pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(2):20. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76220
7. Anderson S. The state of the world's pharmacy: a portrait of the pharmacy profession. J Interprof Care. 2002;16(4):391-404.
8. Driesen A, Leemans L, Baert H, Laekeman G. Flemish community pharmacists’ motivation and views related to continuing education. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27(6):447-452.
9. Tran D, Tofade T, Thakkar N, Rouse M. US and international health professions’ requirements for continuing professional development. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78(6):129. doi: 10.5688/ajpe786129
10. Jorgenson D, Lamb D, MacKinnon NJ. Practice change challenges and priorities: A national survey of practising pharmacists. Can Pharm J. 2011;144(3):125-131.
11. LeClaire J. Pharmacy Specialties. All Healthcare Making it in Medicine. at: http://allhealthcare.monster.com/training/articles/3803-pharmacy-specialties (accessed on September 28, 2015).
12. American College of Clinical Pharmacy, Burke JM, Miller WA, Spencer AP, Crank CW, Adkins L, Bertch KE, Ragucci DP, Smith WE, Valley AW. Clinical pharmacist competencies. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28(6):806-815. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.6.806
13. Hasan S. Continuing education needs assessment of pharmacists in the United Arab Emirates. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(6):670-676. doi: 10.1007/s11096-009-9330-z
14. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Definition of Continuing Education. at: http://www.acpe-accredit.org (accessed on June 24, 2015).
15. Occupational Employment Statistics. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, May 2014. at: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes291051.htm (accessed on June 24, 2015).
16. Mohamed Ibrahim OH. Assessment of Egyptian pharmacists’ attitude, behaviors, and preferences related to continuing education. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012;34(2):358-363. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9616-4
17. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Strategic Goals. at: https://www.acpe-accredit.org/ceproviders/CPD.asp (accessed on October 28, 2015).
18. Strickland-Hodge B. Continuing professional development goes hand-in-hand with pharmacy practice. Pharmacy in Practice. 2008;18(5):173-177.
19. International Pharmaceutical Federation. Statement of professional standards on continuing professional development. The Hague: FIP; 2002. at: www.fip.org/www/uploads/database_file.php?id=221&table_id= (accessed on June 24, 2015).
20. Kuo GM, Lee KC, Ma JD. Implementation and outcomes of a live continuing education program on pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics. 2013;14(8):885-895. doi: 10.2217/pgs.13.77
21. Rouse MJ. Pillars and foundations of quality for continuing education in pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79(3):45. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79345
22. Nesterowicz K, Librowski T, Edelbring S. Validating e-learning in continuing pharmacy education: user acceptance and knowledge change. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-33
23. Wheeler A, Fowler J, Hattingh L. Using an intervention mapping framework to develop an online mental health continuing education program for pharmacy staff. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013;33(4):258-266. doi: 10.1002/chp.21198
24. Grzeskowiak LE, To J, Thomas AE, Phillips AJ. An innovative approach to enhancing continuing education activities for practising pharmacists using clicker technology. Int J Pharm Pract. 2014;22(6):437-439.
25. Namara KP, Duncan GJ, McDowell J, Marriott JL. Community pharmacists' preferences for continuing education delivery in Australia. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29(1):52-57. doi: 10.1002/chp.20006
26. Walters C, Raymont A, Galea S, Wheeler A. Evaluation of online training for the provision of opioid substitution treatment by community pharmacists in New Zealand. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012;31(7):903-910. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00459.x
27. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF, Zyoud SH. Pharmacy education and practice in West Bank, Palestine. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(2):38.
28. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation Standards for Continuing Pharmacy Education. Version 2. 2014. at: https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/CPE_Standards_Final.pdf (accessed on October 28, 2015).
29. Buxton EC, De Muth JE. Pharmacists' perceptions of a live continuing education program comparing distance learning versus local learning. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013;9(2):230-235. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.05.003
30. Scott VG, Amonkar MM, Madhavan SS. Pharmacists' preferences for continuing education and certificate programs. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35(3):289-299.
31. Pharmacist Continuing Education Needs Survey. The James L Winkle College of Pharmacy Board of Advisors (Mike Puccini et al.). at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/?sm=QX2MwSmfnbho3TgwGJ7hhc3sZdTjFJ3DuDzaXk7LXbk%3d (accessed on September 27, 2015).
32. Hanson AL, Bruskiewitz RH, DeMuth, JE. Pharmacists' perceptions of facilitators and barriers to lifelong learning. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(4):67.
33. Cain J, Fox BI. Web 2.0 and pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(7):120.
34. Rouse MJ. Continuing professional development in pharmacy. J Pharm Technol. 2004;20(5):303-306.
35. Jesson J. Cross‐sectional studies in prescribing research. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001;26(6):397-403.
36. Mott DA, Pederson CA, Doucette WR, Gaither CA, Schommer JC. A national survey of US pharmacists in 2000: assessing nonresponse bias of a survey methodology. AAPS PharmSci. 2001;3(4):E33.
37. Oppenheim AN. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2000.
38. Churchhill GA. Marketing research: methodological foundations. New York NY: Rinehart and Winston; 1987.
The authors hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey to Pharmacy Practice: (1) the right to grant permission to republish or reprint the stated material, in whole or in part, without a fee; (2) the right to print pr epublish copies for free distribution or sale; and (3) the right to republish the stated material in any format (electronic or printed). In addition, the undersigned affirms that the article described above has not previously been published, in whole or part, is not subject to copyright or other rights except by the author(s), and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere, except as communicated in writing to Pharmacy Practice with this document.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-ND) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.