The practice of OTC counseling by community pharmacists in Parana, Brazil
Background: In order to provide appropriate advice to the patient at the time of dispensing and over-the-counter (OTC) medication counseling, community pharmacists need access to current and reliable information about medicines. Brazilian pharmacists have assumed new functions such as prescribing medication, in a dependent model, based in protocols.
Objective: To examine the practice of community pharmacists in a Brazilian State, focusing on OTC recommendation.
Method: A cross-sectional survey of community pharmacists in a state of Brazil was conducted from October 2013 to January 2014, with data collection through a pre-piloted self-administered anonymous survey via Survey Monkey® platform. Following ethical approval, the online instrument was sent to 8,885 pharmacists registered in Parana State, Brazil, focusing on professionals working in community pharmacies. The questionnaire assessed the community pharmacy setting, the search for information, the knowledge of the evidence-based practice, the important factors to consider when recommending an OTC medicine, and the pharmacist prescribing. Responses were imported into SPSS® (version 22.0) for analysis. Nonparametric tests were used to assess the association between responses and demographic information with a significance level less than 5% (p<0.05).
Results: Of the pharmacists, 97.4% dispensed medications and counseled patients for a median of six hours per day. Product's efficacy (97%) and adverse effects (62.3%) were the most important factors taken into account when counseling a nonprescription medicine. Few pharmacists knew the meaning of terms related to evidence-based health. Most respondents agreed that pharmacists have the necessary training to prescribe.
Conclusion: Over-the-counter medication counseling is a daily practice among Brazilian pharmacists. Learning needs exist for community pharmacists in relation to evidence-based practice. Thus, sources of information with good evidence could be used daily by community pharmacists, especially as regards nonprescription medication counseling.
2. Brazil, Ministry of Health. National Health Surveillance Agency. Resolution RDC 44, Aug 17, 2009. Provides for Good Pharmaceutical Practices for the sanitary control of the operation, the dispensation and marketing of products and the provision of pharmaceutical services in pharmacies and other measures. Official Gazette, Brasília, DF, number 157, 18 Aug. 2009. Available: http://www.anvisa.gov.br/divulga/noticias/2009/pdf/180809_rdc_44.pdf (accessed July 1, 2014).
3. Brazil, Ministry of Health. National Health Surveillance Agency. Resolution RDC 138, May 29, 2003. Provides for the framework in the category of prescription drugs. Official Gazette, Brasília, DF, 02 Jun. 2003. [Online. Available: http://www.cff.org.br/userfiles/33%20-%20BRASIL_%20MINIST%C3%89RIO%20DA%20SA%C3%9ADE%202003%20RDC_138_2003_ANVISA.pdf (accessed July 1, 2014).
4. The Brazilian Association of Nonprescription Drugs. Available: http://www.abimip.org.br/site/index.php (accessed July 18, 2014).
5. Mansell K, Bootsman N, Kuntz A, Taylor J. Evaluating pharmacist prescribing for minor ailments. Int J Pharm Pract. 2015;23(2):95-101. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12128
6. Lynas K. Pharmacist prescribing for minor ailments could significantly relieve pressure on ERs, say New Brunswick pharmacists. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2013;146(2):70-72. doi: 10.1177/1715163513482707
7. Emmerton L, Marriott J, Bessell T, Nissen L, Dean L. Pharmacists and prescribing rights: review of international developments. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2005;8(2):217-225.
8. Pharmaceutical Society in the State of Parana – Brazil. Resolution number. 586, Aug 29 2013. Regulates the pharmacist prescribing and other provisions. Available: http://www.cff.org.br/userfiles/file/noticias/Resolu%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20586_13%20-%20texto%20final(1).pdf (accessed July 1, 2014).
9. Nissen L. Pharmacist prescribing: What are the next steps?. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68(24):2357-2361. doi: 10.2146/ajhp110216
10. IBGE. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Available: http://www.ibge.gov.br/estadosat/perfil.php?lang=&sigla=pr (accessed August 6, 2014).
11. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4
12. França Filho JB, Correr CJ, Rossignoli P, Melchiors AC, Fernandez-Llimos F, Pontarolo R. [Pharmacist’s and pharmacies profiles in Santa Catarina: structure and process indicators]. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2008;44:105-113.
13. Hanna L, Hughes CM. Pharmacists’ attitudes towards an evidence-based approach for over-the-counter medication. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Feb;34(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9586-y
14. McColl A, Smith H, White P, Field J. General practitioners’ perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316(7128):361-365.
15. Young JM, Ward JE. Evidence-based medicine in general practice: beliefs and barriers among Australian GPs. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001;7(2):201-210.
16. Young JM, Glasziou P, Ward, JE. General practitioners’ self ratings of skills in evidence based medicine: validation study. BMJ. 2002;324(7343):950-951.
17. O’Donnell CA. Attitudes and knowledge of primary care professionals towards evidence-based practice: a postal survey. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):197-205
18. Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence-based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1017.
19. Rutter P, Wadesango E. Does evidence drive pharmacist over-the-counter product recommendations?. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(4):425-428. doi: 10.1111/jep.12157
20. Hanna LA, Hughes C. The influence of evidence-based medicine training on decision-making in relation to over-the-counter medicines: a qualitative study. Int J Pharm Pract. 2012;20(6):358-366. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00220.x
21. Moczygemba LR, Barner JC, Roberson K. Texas pharmacists’ opinions about and plans for provision of medication therapy management services. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2008;48(1):38-45. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07015
22. Schommer JC, Planas LG, Johnson KA, Doucette WR. Pharmacist-provided medication therapy management (part 1): provider perspectives in 2007. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2008;48(3):354-363.
23. Bellanger RA, Shank TC. Continuing professional development in Texas: Survey of pharmacists’ knowledge and attitudes: 2008. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2010;50(3):368-374. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2010.09011
24. Huston SA, Porter KB, Clements T, Shepherd G. Pharmacists’ Attitudes Towards Pediatric Cough and Cold Products and Behind the Counter Status. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2010;15(2):126-137.
25. Caunthon KA, Bowman BJ, Gurney MK. Compounding practices and beliefs of Arizona pharmacists. Int J Pharm Compd. 2013;17(2):154-161.
26. O’Brien KS, Blumberg S, Enanoria WTA, Ackley S, Sippl-Swezey N, Lietman TM. Antibiotic use as a tragedy of the commons: A cross-sectional survey. Comput Math Methods Med. 2014;2014:837929. doi: 10.1155/2014/837929
27. Holman SD, Wietecha MS, Gullard A, Peterson JM. U.S. dental students' attitudes toward research and science: impact of research experience. J Dent Educ. 2014;78(3):334-348.
28. Fleet A, Che M, Mackay-Lyons M, Mackenzie D, Page S, Eskes G, McDonald A, Boyce J, Boe S. Examining the use of constraint-induced movement therapy in canadian neurological occupational and physical therapy. Physiother Can. 2014;66(1):60-71. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2012-61
29. VanGeest JB, Johnson TP, Welch VL. Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: A systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2007;30(4):303-321.
30. Manfreda KL, Bosniak M, Berzelak J, Haas I, Vehovar V. Web surveys versus other survey modes - A meta-analysis comparing response rates. Int J Market Res. 2008;50(1):79-104.
31. Shih TH, Fan XT. Comparing response rates from Web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods. 2008;20(3): 249-271.
32. Scott A, Jeon SH, Joyce CM, Humphreys JS, Kalb G, Witt J, Leahy A. A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-126
The authors hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey to Pharmacy Practice: (1) the right to grant permission to republish or reprint the stated material, in whole or in part, without a fee; (2) the right to print pr epublish copies for free distribution or sale; and (3) the right to republish the stated material in any format (electronic or printed). In addition, the undersigned affirms that the article described above has not previously been published, in whole or part, is not subject to copyright or other rights except by the author(s), and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere, except as communicated in writing to Pharmacy Practice with this document.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-ND) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.