Arkansas pharmacists’ perceptions toward emergency contraception and nonprescription Plan B

  • Denise Hopkins
  • Donna West
Keywords: Contraception, Postcoital, Pharmacists, Attitude of Health Personnel, United States

Abstract

Objective: This study describes Arkansas pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding emergency contraception.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among a convenience sample of pharmacists prior to a continuing education lecture. The 16-item survey included multiple choice and true/false questions to assess knowledge in addition to Likert-type scale questions regarding attitudes and beliefs. Frequency and descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables.

Results: Eighty-eight pharmacists completed the survey. A majority (73%) knew that Plan B had been FDA-approved for nonprescription use yet 42% believed that it works by disrupting a newly implanted ovum. On a scale from 1-5 where 5=strongly agree, the mean item score was 3.2 for whether emergency contraception should be available for nonprescription use with counseling and 1.6 for nonprescription use without counseling. When asked what they would do if presented with a request for emergency contraception, 45.8% indicated they would dispense the drug, 22.9% would refer the patient to another pharmacist or pharmacy, 3.6% would refuse to dispense, and 27.7% were not sure. Almost half (48.6%) did not believe they were competent instructing patients on the use of emergency contraception.

Conclusions: The results show that pharmacists could benefit from additional training on emergency contraception.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Emergency Contraception. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 69. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1443-1452.

2. Emergency Contraception. Committee on Adolescence. Pediatrics 2005;116;1026-1035.

3. Trussell J, Rodriquez G, Ellertson C. Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. Contraception 1999:59:147-151.

4. Henshaw SK, Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspective 1998;30:24-9,46.

5. Borrego ME, Short J, House N, Gupchup G, Naik R, Cuellar D. New Mexico pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs toward prescribing oral emergency contraception. J Am Pharm Assoc 2006;46:33-43.

6. Sutkin G, Grant B, Irons B, Borders T. Opinions of West Texas Pharmacists about Emergency Contraception. Pharm Pract (Internet) 2006;4(4):151-155.

7. Wallace JL, Wu J, Weinstein J, Gorenflo DW, Fetters MD. Emergency contraception: Knowledge and attitudes of family medicine providers. Fam Med 2004;36(6):417-422.

8. Ellerson C, Evans M, Ferden S, et al. Extending the time limit for starting the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception to 120 hours. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:1168-1171.

9. Rodrigues I, Grou F, Jolly J. Effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected sexual intercourse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:531-534.

10. Hopkins D, Boss M. Pharmacists’ right to refuse to dispense prescriptions based on moral grounds; a national survey of state laws and regulations. Hosp Pharm 2006;4(12);1176-1179.
Published
2008-06-17
Section
Original Research