Pilot assessment of patient satisfaction and clinical impact of Medicare Part D in diabetic geriatric patients

  • Sandra L. Kim
  • Daniel R. Touchette
  • Jo A. Stubbings
  • Anne M. Schullo-Feulner
  • Karen S. Pater
Keywords: Medicare Part D, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, United States


Objectives: To assess patients’ 1) satisfaction with their decision to enroll or not enroll in the Medicare Part D program, and 2) clinical status of diabetes before and after decision to enroll in Medicare Part D.

Methods: Patients 65 years or older were enrolled in the study from November 2006 through February 2007. Patients were screened by a clinical pharmacist at their clinician visit and administered a Medicare Part D satisfaction survey. Upon completion of the survey, a retrospective chart review was completed in diabetic patients who were enrolled in Medicare Part D to assess goal attainment of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and blood pressure. Pre-enrollment values were obtained in the 6 months prior to the start of Medicare Part D enrollment (July 1- December 31, 2005). Post-enrollment values were obtained after enrollment was complete for the 2006 year (May 1- October 31, 2006).

Results: Results show that 74% (60/81) of patients surveyed were enrolled into the Medicare Part D program, including patients who have dual eligibility. Of the 60 patients who were enrolled in Medicare Part D, 48 patients (80.0%) responded that they were satisfied with their decision to enroll. Clinical outcomes were unchanged from the pre-enrollment to the post-enrollment periods. Mean HbA1c was 7.47% in the pre-enrollment period and 7.25% post-enrollment (differencepre-post = 0.23; 95%CI = -0.28 to 0.73). There was no change in LDL in the two time periods (pre = 79.4 mg/dL; post = 79.7; differencepre-post = -0.25; 95%CI = -13.6 to 13.1). Similarly, there were no significant differences observed for blood pressure. Mean systolic blood pressure was 129.5 in the pre-enrollment period and 131.6 in the post-enrollment period (differencepre-post = -2.1; 95%CI = -7.0 to 2.7). Mean diastolic blood pressure was 70.3 for the pre-enrollment period and 70.7 for the post-enrollment period (differencepre-post = -0.4; 95%CI = -4.2 to 3.4).

Conclusion: Patients were generally satisfied with their decision to enroll in Medicare Part D. Clinical outcomes were not affected by participation in a Medicare Part D plan. More longitudinal studies are necessary to determine long term impact of Medicare Part D on diabetes management.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Centers for Disease Control, National Diabetes Surveillance System. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/prev/national/tnumage.htm. Accessed August 17, 2006.

2. Ashkenazy R, Abrahamson M. Medicare Coverage for Patients with Diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:386-392.

3. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Formulary Review Guidelines. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PrescriptionDrugCovContra/03_RxContracting_FormularyGuidance.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed August 17, 2006.

4. Piette J, Wagner T, Potter M, Schillinger D. Health insurance status, cost-related medication underuse, and outcomes among diabetes patients in three systems of care. Med Care. 2004;42(2):102-109.

5. Soumerai SB, Pierre-Jacques M, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D, Adams AS, Gurwitz J, Adler G, Safran DG. Cost-related medication nonadherence among elderly and disabled Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17):1829-1835.

6. Piette J, Heisler M, Wagner T. Cost-related medication underuse among chronically ill adults: the treatments people forgo, how often, and who is at risk. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1782-1787.

7. Spertus J, Decker C, Woodman C, House J, Jones P, O’Keefe J, Borkon AM. Effect of difficulty affording health care on health status after coronary revascularization Circulation. 2005;111(20):2572-2578.

8. Kennedy J, Coyne J, Sclar D. Drug affordability and prescription noncompliance in the United States: 1997-2002. Clin Ther. 2004;26(4):607-614.

9. Shinogle J, Wiener J. Medication use among Medicaid users of home and community-based services. Health Care Financ Rev. 2006;28(1):103-106.

10. Jackson J, Doescher M, Saver B, Fishman P. Prescription drug coverage, health, and mediation acquisition among seniors with one or more chronic conditions. Med Care. 2004;42(11):1056-1065.

11. Joyce G, Goldman D, Karaca-Mandic P, Zheng Y. Pharmacy benefit caps and the chronically ill. Health Aff. 2007;26(5):1333-1344.

12. Steinman M, Sands L, Covinsky K. Self-restriction of medications due to cost in seniors without prescription coverage. J Gen Intern Med.2001;16(12):793-799.

13. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Auto-Enrollment and Facilitated Enrollment of Low Income Populations. Available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/States/Downloads/AutoversusFacilitatedEnrollment.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2007.

14. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29:S4-S42.

15. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Bridging the Coverage Gap. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PrescriptionDrugCovGenIn/01a_bridgingthegap.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed November 21, 2007.

16. Keenan, Teresa. Prescription drugs research report. 2007 November. Available at: http://www.aarp.org/research/health/drugs/rx_medicare d.html. Accessed April 20, 2008.

17. Heiss F, McFadden D, Winter J. Who failed to enroll in Medicare Part D, and why? Early results. Health Aff (Milwood). 2006;25(5):w344-354.

18. Tjia J, Schwartz JS. Will the Medicare prescription drug benefit eliminate cost barriers for older adults with diabetes mellitus? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(4):606-612.

19. Hsu J, Fung V, Price M, Huang J, Brand R, Hui R, Fireman B, Newhouse JP. Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge of Part D prescription drug program benefits and responses to drug costs. JAMA. 2008;299(16):1929-1936.

20. Madden JM, Graves AJ, Zhang F, Adams AS, Briesacher BA, Ross-Degnan D, Gurwitz JH, Pierre-Jacques M, Safran DG, Adler GS, Soumerai SB. Cost-related medication nonadherence and spending on basic needs following implementation of Medicare Part D. JAMA. 2008;299(16):1922-1928.

21. Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard School of Public Health survey. Seniors and the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit. Available at: www.kff.org. Accessed April 26, 2007.

22. Fuke D, Hunt J, Siemienczuk J, Estoup M, Carroll M, Payne N, Touchette D. Cholesterol management of patients with diabetes in a primary care practice-based research network. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(2 Pt 2):130-136.

23. Mangione CM, Gerzoff RB, Williamson DF, Steers WN, Kerr EA, Brown AF, Waitzfelder BE, Marrero DG, Dudley RA, Kim C, Herman W, Thompson TJ, Safford MM, Selby JV; TRIAD Study Group. The association between quality of care and the intensity of diabetes disease management programs. Ann Intern Med. 2006:145(2):107-116.
How to Cite
Kim SL, Touchette DR, Stubbings JA, Schullo-Feulner AM, Pater KS. Pilot assessment of patient satisfaction and clinical impact of Medicare Part D in diabetic geriatric patients. Pharm Pract (Granada) [Internet]. 2008Sep.15 [cited 2019Jun.27];6(3):128-35. Available from: https://www.pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/209
Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)