Pharmacist Perceptions of New Competency Standards

  • Pagamas Maitreemit
  • Petcharat Pongcharoensuk
  • Nattiya Kapol
  • Edward P. Armstrong
Keywords: Professional Competence, Pharmacists, Education, Pharmacy, Thailand


Objective: To suggest revisions to the Thai pharmacy competency standards and determine the perceptions of Thai pharmacy practitioners and faculty about the proposed pharmacy competency standards.

Methods: The current competency standards were revised by brainstorming session with nine Thai pharmacy experts according to their perceptions of society’s pharmacy needs. The revised standards were proposed and validated by 574 pharmacy practitioners and faculty members by using a written questionnaire. The respondents were classified based on their practice setting.

Results: The revision of pharmacy competency standard proposed the integration and addition to current competencies. Of 830 distributed questionnaires, 574 completed questionnaires were received (69.2% response rate). The proposed new competency standards contained 7 domains and 46 competencies. The majority of the respondents were supportive of all 46 proposed competencies. The highest ranked domain was Domain 1 (Practice Pharmacy within Laws, Professional Standards, and Ethics). The second and third highest expectations of pharmacy graduates were Domain 4 (Provide pharmaceutical care) and Domain 3 (Communicate and disseminate knowledge effectively).

Conclusion: The expectation for pharmacy graduates’ competencies were high and respondents encouraged additional growth in multidisciplinary efforts to improve patient care.


Download data is not yet available.


1. McConnell EA. Competence vs. competency. Nurs Manag. 2001;32(5):14.

2. Dobbert DJ. Experiences with and assessment of competency-based curriculum in disciplines outside of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 1975;39(5): 560-566.

3. Grussing PG. Curricular design: competency perspective. Am J Pharm Educ. 1987;51(4):414-419.

4. Core committee, Institute for International Medical Education. Global minimum essential requirements in medical education. Med Teach. 2002;24(2):130-135.

5. Lenburg CB. The framework, concepts and methods of the competency outcomes and performance assessment (COPA) model. Online J Issues Nurs. 1999; 4.

6. Competency Standards for Pharmacists in Australia 2003, Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. (Accessed on August 16, 2006, at output =print)

7. Professional Competencies for Canadian Pharmacists at Entry to Practice, 1997. National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities, Canada. (Accessed on August 20, 2004, at

8. Standard criteria for pharmacy practitioners 2002. Thai Pharmacy Council. (Access on August 20, 2004, at html)

9. McCombs JS, Nichol MB, Johnson KA, Hay JW, Ebin VJ, Lawrence GD, Schneider JS. Is pharmacy's vision of the future too narrow? Am J Health Syst Pharm. Jun 1 1995;52(11):1208-1214.

10. Jantarasakul J. "Evolution of Pharmacy Profession" in The 9th year of The Pharmacy Council. Bangkok: Integrated Publication, Co., Ltd.; 2003:90.

11. Accreditation Standards and Guidelines for The Professional Program in Pharmacy Leading to The Doctor of Pharmacy Degree. Chicago, Illinois: Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, 2006. (Accessed on Jul 13, 2006, at http://

12. van Mil JWF, Schulz M, Tromp TFJ. Pharmaceutical care, European developments in concepts, implementation, teaching, and research: a review. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26:303-311.

13. Porter ME. Survey of pharmacists' attitudes toward formal academic pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 1978;42(8):264-269.
How to Cite
Maitreemit P, Pongcharoensuk P, Kapol N, Armstrong EP. Pharmacist Perceptions of New Competency Standards. Pharm Pract (Granada) [Internet]. 2008Sep.15 [cited 2019Jun.27];6(3):113-20. Available from:
Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)