Health promotion at Swedish pharmacies – views of the staff

  • Ingeborg Bjorkman
  • Nina Viberg
  • Linda Rydberg
  • Cecilia Stalsby Lundborg
Keywords: Public Health Practice, Community Pharmacy Services, Professional Practice, Sweden


The role of pharmacy has changed dramatically during the last decades, which has led to new demands on pharmacy personnel.

Objective: This study aims at exploring the attitudes of Swedish pharmacy personnel on their role as public health promoters and to look at the opportunities and obstacles they identify in the efforts to widen the pharmacy remit to include a wider health approach.

Method: Eight focus group discussions were conducted with a strategic sample of pharmacy personnel working in two counties in Sweden. The discussions were transcribed verbatim and analysed by qualitative inductive analysis.

Results: Five themes were identified, “Pharmacy activities impact on public health”, “The employer, Apoteket AB”, “The new role welcomed”, “Obstacles in the new role”, and “Need of change and support”.

Conclusion: The concept of pharmacy personnel as public health promoters was not initially in the mindset of the participants. In the process of discussion, the impact of traditional pharmacy practice as well as new pharmacy based initiatives on public health gradually became more obvious to them. The findings show a pharmacy staff involved in a process of change. The participants have not yet landed in their new role as public health promoters and the study shows that practical as well as conceptual support is needed in order for pharmacy personnel to play a more important role in public health.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Edmunds J, Calnan MW. The reprofessionalisation of community pharmacy? An exploration of attitudes to extended roles for community pharmacists amongst pharmacists and General Practitioners in the United Kingdom. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(7):943-955.

2. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Health and medical care policy. Hälso- och sjukvårdslagen (in Swedish). SFS 1982:763, 2b§.

3. Swedish Commission. SOU 1997:154. Patienten har rätt. Betänkande från Kommittén om hälso- och sjukvårdens finansiering och organisation, HSU 2000 (The patient is right. Report from the Committee of Health Care Financing and Organisation, HSU 2000) (in Swedish). Available from: (Accessed 21 October 2008).

4. Swedish Commission. SOU 1999:66. God vård på lika villkor? - om statens styrning av hälso- och sjukvården. Betänkande från Kommittén om hälso- och sjukvårdens finansiering och organisation, HSU 2000 - Good care on equal conditions? - about the government direction of the healthcare. Report from the Committee of Health Care Financing and Organisation, HSU 2000 (in Swedish). Available from: (Accessed 21 October 2008).

5. Medical Products Agency. Code of Statues. Receptföreskrifter (in Swedish). 1984 LVFS 1990:27.

6. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Health and medical care policy. Hälso- och sjukvårdslagen (in Swedish). SFS 1994:953.

7. Mayer JA, Eckhardt L, Stepanski BM, Sallis JF, Elder JP, Slymen DJ, Creech L, Graf G, Palmer RC, Rosenberg C, Souvignier ST. Promoting skin cancer prevention counseling by pharmacists. Am J Public Health. 1998;7:1096-1099.

8. Anderson C. Health promotion in community pharmacy: the UK situation. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39(2-3):285-291.

9. Apoteket AB. Årsredovisning 2006 - Yearly report 2006 (in Swedish), available at Accessed Aug 2007.

10. Westerlund LT, Björk HT. Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies: practice and research in Sweden. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(6):1162-1169.

11. Hammarstrom B, Wessling A, Nilsson JL. Pharmaceutical care for patients with skin diseases: a campaign year at Swedish pharmacies. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1995;20(6):327-334.

12. Lisper B, Nilsson JL. The asthma year in Swedish pharmacies: a nationwide information and pharmaceutical care program for patients with asthma. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30(5):455-460.

13. Nilsson JLG, Andersson Å, Kälvemark S, Lieberman-Ram H, Ullenius B, Wendel A, Åberg Å. Surveys of drug-related therapy problems of patients using medicines for allergy, asthma and pain. Int J Pharm Pract. 2000:198-203.

14. Apoteket AB. Reumaåret 2002. Rapport temaåret 2002 - The rheumatoid year 2002 (in Swedish). Stockholm: Apoteket AB; 2003.

15. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483-488.

16. Malterud K. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning (Qualitative methods in medical research) (in Swedish). Lund: Studentlitteratur; 1998.

17. Lloyd-Williams F. The effect of an intervention programme to improve health education leaflet uptake and distribution in community pharmacies. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;49(1):27-33.

18. Larsson EC, Viberg N, Vernby Å, Nordmark J, Stålsby Lundborg C. Health information, an area for competition in Swedish pharmacies. Pharmacy Practice (Internet). 2008;6(2):74-78.

19. Nordling S. Hälsotorget i Lyckeby. Hur har det påverkat befolkningen och hälso- och sjukvårdsverksamheten? - The Health point in Lyckeby. How are the public and healthcare influenced? (in Swedish). Lund: IHE Rapport 2003:1; 2003.

20. Morgall JM, Almarsdottir AB. No struggle, no strength: how pharmacists lost their monopoly. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(9):1247-1258.

21. Almarsdottir AB, Morgall JM. Technicians or patient advocates?--still a valid question (results of focus group discussions with pharmacists). Pharm World Sci. 1999;21(3):127-131.

22. Kansanaho H, Puumalainen I, Varunki M, Ahonen R, Airaksinen M. Implementation of a professional program in Finnish community pharmacies in 2000-2002. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):272-279.

23. Wazaify M, Hughes CM, McElnay JC. The implementation of a harm minimisation model for the identification and treatment of over-the-counter drug misuse and abuse in community pharmacies in Northern Ireland. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1-3):136-141.

24. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Barometer of public opinions on healthcare (Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. Vårdbarometern) (In Swedish) Available at Accessed 23 October 2007.

25. Pronk MC, Blom AT, Jonkers R, Van Burg A. The diffusion process of patient education in Dutch community pharmacy: an exploration. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;42(2):115-121.

26. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1985.

27. Hamberg K, Johansson E, Lindgren G, Westman G. Scientific rigour in qualitative research--examples from a study of women's health in family practice. Fam Pract. 1994;11(2):176-181.
How to Cite
Bjorkman I, Viberg N, Rydberg L, Stalsby Lundborg C. Health promotion at Swedish pharmacies – views of the staff. Pharm Pract (Granada) [Internet]. 2008Dec.15 [cited 2019Jun.27];6(4):211-8. Available from:
Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)