About the journal Archive Boards Authors Reviewers

Pharmacy Practice 2006; 4(4): 151-155.
available since 12-December-2006

Opinions of West Texas pharmacists about emergency contraception.
Gary SUTKIN, Brenda GRANT, Brian K. IRONS, Tyrone F. BORDERS.
Abstract:

Background: The pharmacist’s role in dispensing emergency contraception (EC) has become controversial due to the intersection of personal and professional ethics. Therefore, to examine the issue of EC availability, we surveyed a sample of West Texas pharmacists. West Texas is a religiously and politically conservative region where no methods of EC have been made available.
Objective: to survey a sample of pharmacists in West Texas about their experience, beliefs, and knowledge of EC both before and after a presentation of the current literature about EC.
Methods: We asked a convenience sample of 75 pharmacists about their experience, beliefs, and knowledge of EC both before and after a presentation of the current literature about EC.
Results: Sixty-four (85%) pharmacists agreed to complete the study questionnaire. None carries EC in his/her pharmacy, and scientific understanding of EC was generally poor. Fourteen percent stated EC conflicts with their religious views, 17% considered it a method of abortion, 11% would not be willing to fill an EC prescription written by a doctor. 58% would be willing to offer EC over the counter. The presentation encouraged more to offer it over the counter, but in general did not significantly change their beliefs.
Conclusion: Our sample of West Texas pharmacists demonstrated very little experience with, a general lack of knowledge about, and some personal and religious objections to EC.

 

 

Keywords:  
Contraception, Postcoital. Pharmacists. Ethics, Pharmacy. United States.  
 
  www.pharmacypractice.org
 
   

 

 

 

 

version: Thursday, 11-Oct-2007 11:25